Saba Purtseladze vs Stuart Parker Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second serve performance in recent months shows Purtseladze with a slight edge, winning 46.35% of points compared to Parker's 44.34%.
• On return games, Parker has a slight advantage, winning 46.08% of their opponent's second serve points, versus Purtseladze's 45.36%.
• For first serve returns, Parker excels with a 26.59% win rate compared to Purtseladze's 20.53%.
• Under pressure, Purtseladze has performed slightly better, saving 51.23% of breakpoints while Parker has saved 49.82%.
• Purtseledze has a higher overall match win percentage over the past year at 65.17%, compared to Parker's 59.02%.
• Both players perform best on hard courts, but Parker has a slightly higher win percentage on this surface (69%) than Purtseladze (62%).
• Purtseledze has a stronger track record in lower-level tournaments ($10K), with a win rate of 77.05% against Parker's 60.98%.
• In terms of opponent quality, Parker has faced stronger competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 334.69, compared to Purtseladze's opponents at 448.1 in the last 12 months.
• If the match goes to a deciding set, Parker might be favored, having won 67% of such sets compared to Purtseladze's 65% winning rate.
• Breakpoint conversion gives Parker a notable edge, with a recent conversion rate of 35.17% compared to 26.11% for Purtseladze.

Editorial Prediction (May 13, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing recent performance, Parker displays a slight advantage in several key areas. Their ability to win first serve return points and a higher breakpoint conversion rate reflect a strong capacity to seize offensive opportunities.

While Purtseladze has a marginally better second-serve performance, Parker’s return game and experience against tougher competition provide them an edge. Parker's experience in handling deciding sets could also play a pivotal role if the match extends to that stage.

Despite Purtseladze's impressive overall win percentage and effectiveness at lower tournament levels, Parker’s broader experience in varying conditions and slightly superior metrics in decisive match situations suggest that Parker is the more likely winner in this upcoming match.